Upon request , translated : Double your blog clicks in no time!

Titles like that do seem to work. Alas, perhaps!

Yes, dear reader, these last couple of weeks i’ve been harassing you, being omnipresent on twitter and facebook, drawing your attention towards my blogposts in every possible way. It wasn’t to my benefit , it did it all for you. Pure love!. I wanted to know if all the generally accepted theories on blogging and how to  beautify your statistics are working.  So allow me to offer my sincerest of apologies for the way i’ve been behaving these last couple of days. It must have been terribly irritating!

First the good news, Yes you can! It’s not difficult to boost your figures.

Now the bad news, If you want to become a one hit wonder, i’d say, read all the tips below, and growth will be your part. If – however, you want to acquire readership and a loyal public on a permanent basis, all the below might show itself as being counterproductive to your goals. There’s only one constant factor, and that’s hard work (and added value). All the rest are little tricks, of the trade, which, if not used carefully might very well end up , ruining your reputation.
I probably won’t tell you much new facts, but allow me to share my findings, first hand, it’s the least i can do.

1 The blog in itself.

It helps if you can write. It looks like a stupid recommendation, it is not. When you’re not fluent (by the way, the original blog post is in Dutch, my native language), but rather tedious, with a crappy style and a total lack of humor, chances are your audience will find you boring and drop you altogether. Be sure to have an opinion, albeit not the most popular one, use good humor, and use it scarcely, and well proportioned. Readers don’t want to get bored, they need added value, entertainment. Nice pictures, catchy titles, original statements, it helps. Ask questions, and press your audience for replies, it creates involvement.
2. Your network .

In the early days, i was convinced that my friends actually used my webpage as their homepage. Not even my mother did that! So i started looking for other solutions. That was a period in my life where i had like 5 regular readers. I tried email, which didn’t really work. Twitter, Linkedin and Facebook, are my natural channels. My audience grew at least tenfold. Hence the importance of your title, it should be tweetable and haver appeal : ‘A sociodemographic study on the effect of personalization on the linear correlation with statistic readership growth’ won’t cut it ‘Sex sells’ on the other hand… A sure winner!
The reason is obvious. THere’s no such thing as a ‘source effect’ yet. A little piece written by Guido is not the same thing as ‘some remarks by Philip Kotler’. Give it a twist, some provocation, some mystery, the vague promise of a solution, poetry, anything goes, but dull!

There are other things to be said on the network topic :

Content wise: reply upon reactions. It creates loyalty, interaction, conversation.  Carry the discussion towards the appropriate platform, facebook for the light stuff, twitter and linkedin for the more work related issues. Think before you do so. It affects curiosity, people will catch up on the thread.
Reading and commenting on the blogs of those readers who reacted on your posts is also helpful and a sign of politeness. It creates strong bonds, Just like in real life. Strange, isn’t it? Kindness leads to kindness.

The network in itself : if you’re only present to boost your self promotion, you really didn’t get it.  There’s some sort of sympathy coefficient, which counts. Engage in the discussions, be sharp, witty and real.  Get a personality and a face in the online communities. It adds to your credibility and hence to your readership.

3. Don’t.

You can fake it if you want. A small lists of tricks and hints that work.
Not everyone sees the tweet announcing your blogpost. Learn to live with it. you can re-tweet later on the day, but twice is an absolute maximum, if you want to avoid looking like a prat. If the content is good, people will pick it up and spread it, if not, you look like an complete failure, drawing attention to things which have no added value.
Remember that people aren’t idiots and don’t like self promotion at their expense.

Another way of doing it, is by constantly looking for discussions where you can plug your old articles into the discussion ‘Interesting ideas there, i’ve written a blogpost on the subject’ … don’t overdo it, please, it’s so obvious…

You can also try to be a smart ass by making purely mechanical remarks like ‘Too bad, another x readers and i would have reached my all time high with this blogpost’. Reaction is guaranteed, and an increase of 20%, depending on the width of your network is possible. Any publicity is good publicity. But think twice. do you want clicks or readers that enjoy your writing and will come back?

On the shady side, but perfectly acceptable : take a successful viral, put it on your blog, and write a comment. Your piggy bagging on someone else’s success. If it doesn’t bother you, that’s ok. i personally find it not very enriching, nor does it add value to your own writing. but it works.

Simple brains, on the other hand. If you know you’re going to be cited on #followfriday, it might be wise to have a really good blogpost as your last contribution, so that new followers, who want to get acquainted with your work get a positive impression. nothing wrong with that. Again, if that’s the only article you can write, your creating future problems.

4. Frequence.

This is a tricky one. Posting on a regular basis helps, that’s for sure. The attention span of a blogpost doesn’t exceed two days. Afterwards your readership diminishes with half for every other day (100-50-25-12-6-3-1)  My gut feelings says that i should at least post once every other day. . It gives you a sort of constant flow of clicks, where good articles are rewarded with peeks because of a ‘spread’ effect.
This last week, i posted two articles a day, which is a very harsh rhythm, if it is not your main activity. It does add to your visibility and thus to your readership, on the other hand i’m not sure that a flow of this kind will not end being irritating in the end.  A side effect is that your writing improves too.

5. Diverse

External links, can help a lot. But there’s no general conclusion to be drawn. the presence of your name and blog on external sites sometimes help, but it’s got a lot to do with the quality and the traffic of that particular site. It didn’t really work for me. what does help is the fact you’re being quoted by influential bloggers. It happened on several occasions, and it affects your twitter followers as well as the daily visitors to your blog.
I’ll quantify most of these phenomena in another post, but for now, if you have other questions, feel free to ask, you know where to find me…

Advertenties

10 gedachtes over “Upon request , translated : Double your blog clicks in no time!

  1. Pingback: Blogkermis: Slim gebruik van Sociale Media

  2. Frequentie is inderdaad de moeilijkste. Want frequentie zonder kwaliteit is ook gevaarlijk. Zes posts per week waarvan er maar één de moeite is, dat blijft niet duren. Maar meer schrijven zorgt dan weer dat je de kwaliteit wat in de vingers krijgt. Moeilijk, dus. Het helpt om een collectie drafts of ideetjes bij te houden, om reeksjes in één keer te schrijven, dan win je wat efficiëntie.
    Kwaliteit is ook geen synoniem voor lengte, merk ik. Het mag best kort.
    Wat ik niet zie staan is een keuze van (specifiek) onderwerp. Je leest overal dat je zo blog zo specifiek mogelijk moet zijn: liever over katten dan over huisdieren, en liever over katten houden op een appartement dan over katten tout-court. Ik heb het daar heel lastig mee, en ook daar komt het spook frequentie weer om de hoek piepen. Maar het klopt volgens mij wel. Ik merk in elk geval bij mezelf dat blogs die een specifiek thema hebben herkenbaarder zijn en blijven hangen.
    Fijn dat je zo’n artikel ook eens leest vanuit het standpunt van Nederlandstalige bloggers. Veel VS-based advies is moeilijk of niet lokaal toepasbaar. Te opschepperig doen via Twitter ea. is zo’n valkuil.

    • Toon,

      dank voor je reactie, wat onderwerp betreft heb je gelijk, ik heb dat snel over één kam geschoren qua catchy titel. Maar ik merk ook dat ik meer hits krijg op ‘technischer’ onderwerpen, allicht omdat de tags en titel meer voorkomen in searches.

      • Dat varieert bij mij. Er is ook een (groot) verschil tussen berichten waarop gereageerd wordt en berichten die ‘gewoon’ veel gelezen worden. Dat zijn niet per se dezelfde. De Google-bezoeker vs. de Twitter/Facebook-bezoeker, zeg maar. Geef mij maar die laatste, overigens. Minder maar beter.
        Ik merk dat alles wat praktisch bruikbaar is of een how-to suggereert vrij succesvol is qua bezoek (zoektermen, denk ik). Al wat een mening/eigen visie combineert met een algemeen bekend en makkelijk te begrijpen fenomeen lokt reacties uit.
        Uit mijn statistieken merk ik ook een noodzaak om een specifieker thema uit te werken. Populairste tag all time is ‘knutselen’, maar ik doe daar niks mee. Media en speelgoed voor kinderen is er ook zo één waar wel wat in zit. Maar ja. Geen discipline, he, ze zeiden dat op school al.

  3. Ik vond u en uw blog, per toeval, via twitter en heb zoeven al meerdere malen mogen glimlachen bij enkele van uw schrijfsels. Waarvoor dank op deze grauwe vrijdagochtend. Bij deze weer één volger meer.

  4. Hela, hela, een min of meer invloedrijke blogpost, ik hemel je godverdomme twee keer op en dan is het een min of meer invloedrijke blogpost.

    Nee serieus, het helpt ook als je niet ziet dat er een strategie achter zit. Vind ik.

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Twitter-afbeelding

Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Google+ photo

Je reageert onder je Google+ account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Verbinden met %s